Current:Home > reviewsRembrandt portraits that were privately held for nearly 200 years go on show in Amsterdam -SovereignWealth
Rembrandt portraits that were privately held for nearly 200 years go on show in Amsterdam
View
Date:2025-04-18 14:32:50
THE HAGUE, Netherlands (AP) — After nearly 200 years in a private collection, a pair of small portraits by 17th century Dutch Master Rembrandt van Rijn went on display Wednesday after a long-term loan to the Netherlands’ national art and history museum.
The Rijksmuseum said the portraits of Jan Willemsz van der Pluym and his wife Jaapgen “disappeared from view for almost two centuries, before resurfacing two years ago.”
The paintings, believed to be the last known pair of privately held Rembrandt portraits, were sold at auction this year and given on long-term loan by the family of wealthy Dutch businessman Henry Holterman, the museum said.
“Given my close relationship with the museum and the fact that the team of experts has been conducting research into these portraits over a period of years, I feel that these works belong in the museum,” Holterman said in a statement.
The museum said that based on their small size and “dynamic, sketchy style,” the portraits likely were painted by Rembrandt as a favor to the couple, who had close links to his family since Jan and Jaapgen’s son Dominicus married the painter’s cousin, Cornelia Cornelisdr van Suytbroek.
Rijksmuseum Director Taco Dibbits welcomed the loan and said the portraits “will bring visitors closer to Rembrandt’s family circle.”
Researchers at the museum worked to establish that Rembrandt painted the portraits, which measure about 20x16.5 centimeters (8x6 inches), using high-tech scans and paint analysis.
“When taken together, the various research results amount to compelling evidence,” the museum said.
The portraits were hung alongside other works by Rembrandt.
veryGood! (28951)
Related
- 'Malcolm in the Middle’ to return with new episodes featuring Frankie Muniz
- Ohio Supreme Court sides with pharmacies in appeal of $650 million opioid judgment
- Fortnite OG is back. Here's what to know about the mode's release, maps and game pass.
- Biden says he was ‘stupid’ not to put his name on pandemic relief checks like Trump did
- SFO's new sensory room helps neurodivergent travelers fight flying jitters
- Man identifying himself as American Travis Timmerman found in Syria after being freed from prison
- Alex Jones keeps Infowars for now after judge rejects The Onion’s winning auction bid
- The Daily Money: Now, that's a lot of zeroes!
- Most popular books of the week: See what topped USA TODAY's bestselling books list
- Man on trial in Ole Miss student’s death lied to investigators, police chief says
Ranking
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
- The best tech gifts, gadgets for the holidays featured on 'The Today Show'
- 'Wicked' sing
- Blast rocks residential building in southern China
- The Super Bowl could end in a 'three
- Atmospheric river and potential bomb cyclone bring chaotic winter weather to East Coast
- As a Major California Oil Producer Eyes Carbon Storage, Thousands of Idle Wells Await Cleanup
- With the Eras Tour over, what does Taylor Swift have up her sleeve next? What we know
Recommendation
The Louvre will be renovated and the 'Mona Lisa' will have her own room
TikTok asks Supreme Court to review ban legislation, content creators react: What to know
Timothée Chalamet makes an electric Bob Dylan: 'A Complete Unknown' review
Ohio Supreme Court sides with pharmacies in appeal of $650 million opioid judgment
Military service academies see drop in reported sexual assaults after alarming surge
Neanderthals likely began 'mixing' with modern humans later than previously thought
Krispy Kreme's 'Day of the Dozens' offers 12 free doughnuts with purchase: When to get the deal
'Vanderpump Rules' star DJ James Kennedy arrested on domestic violence charges