Current:Home > NewsRepublican prosecutor will appeal judge’s ruling invalidating Wisconsin’s 174-year-old abortion ban -SovereignWealth
Republican prosecutor will appeal judge’s ruling invalidating Wisconsin’s 174-year-old abortion ban
View
Date:2025-04-17 00:31:32
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — A Republican prosecutor said Tuesday that he plans to appeal a court ruling that Wisconsin law permits consensual medical abortions, the first step toward a potential showdown in the state Supreme Court over abortion rights.
Sheboygan County District Attorney Joel Urmanski issued a statement through his attorneys saying that he disagrees with Dane County Circuit Judge Diane Schlipper’s July finding and state law clearly bans abortions, including consensual medical abortions.
The case appears destined to end up at the state Supreme Court.
Liberal justices currently hold a 4-3 majority on the court, making it unlikely that conservatives would prevail at that level. Urmanski could string out the process beyond the 2025 spring elections, however, in the hopes that liberal Justice Ann Walsh Bradley loses re-election and conservatives regain control of the court.
In question is an 1849 Wisconsin law that conservatives have interpreted as banning abortion. The U.S. Supreme Court’s June 2022 decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, the landmark 1973 decision legalizing abortion, reactivated the law. Abortion providers subsequently ceased operations in the state out of fear of violating the ban.
Democratic Attorney General Josh Kaul filed a lawsuit days after the Supreme Court decision, challenging the ban’s validity. He argued the statutes were too old to enforce and a 1985 law permitting abortions before fetuses can survive outside the womb trumps the ban. Three doctors later joined the lawsuit as plaintiffs, saying they fear being prosecuted for performing abortions.
Urmanski is defending the ban in court. The city of Sheboygan is home to one of Planned Parenthood’s three Wisconsin clinics that provide abortions. The others are in Madison and Milwaukee.
Schlipper ruled this past July that the abortion ban prohibits someone from attacking a woman in an attempt to kill her unborn child but doesn’t apply to consensual medical abortions. Her finding didn’t formally end the lawsuit but Planned Parenthood was confident enough in the ruling to resume abortion procedures at their Madison and Milwaukee clinics in September.
Urmanski later filed a motion asking Schlipper to reconsider her ruling. She refused in a 14-page opinion issued Tuesday, writing that Urmanski failed to show how she misapplied state law or made any other mistake and declared that the plaintiffs had won the suit.
She also declined the doctors’ request to issue an injunction prohibiting prosecutors from charging abortion providers, saying she’s confidant prosecutors will follow her ruling.
Dane County District Attorney Ismael Ozanne and Milwaukee County District Attorney John Chisholm, both Democrats, have said they would abide by Schlipper’s ruling. Urmanski has said he would abide by it as well. He reiterated in his statement Tuesday that he’s obligated to follow the ruling unless it’s stayed on appeal.
Kaul said during a news conference Wednesday morning before Urmanski’s announcement that he fully expected an appeal.
“This decision can be appealed. I expect that it likely will be,” Kaul said. “And so other courts will weigh in on this. But for now, this is a major win for reproductive freedom in Wisconsin, and we are prepared to defend that victory and reproductive freedom as we move forward.”
___
Associated Press writer Scott Bauer contributed to this report.
veryGood! (34455)
Related
- Paula Abdul settles lawsuit with former 'So You Think You Can Dance' co
- Afghans fleeing Pakistan lack water, food and shelter once they cross the border, aid groups say
- How real estate brokerage ruling could impact home buyers and sellers
- Boy killed in Cincinnati shooting that wounded 5 others, some juveniles, police say
- Man can't find second winning lottery ticket, sues over $394 million jackpot, lawsuit says
- Judge dismisses challenge to New Hampshire’s provisional voting law
- Jason Aldean says he stands by controversial Try That in a Small Town: I know what the intentions were
- The Israel-Hamas war has not quashed their compassion, their empathy, their hope
- The city of Chicago is ordered to pay nearly $80M for a police chase that killed a 10
- Online database launched to track missing and murdered Indigenous people
Ranking
- Rylee Arnold Shares a Long
- AP Top 25 Takeaways: Separation weekend in Big 12, SEC becomes survive-and-advance day around nation
- Large carnivore ecologist Dr. Rae Wynn-Grant talks black bears and gummy bears
- Indiana police investigate shooting that left 3 people dead
- The Grammy nominee you need to hear: Esperanza Spalding
- Summer House's Carl Radke Defends Decision to Call Off Wedding to Lindsay Hubbard
- Proof Kourtney Kardashian and Travis Barker's Family of 9 Is the Most Interesting to Look At
- VPR's Ariana Madix Reveals the Name Tom Sandoval Called Her After Awkward BravoCon Reunion
Recommendation
Google unveils a quantum chip. Could it help unlock the universe's deepest secrets?
Celebrities running in the 2023 NYC Marathon on Sunday
Katy Perry and Orlando Bloom's Daughter Daisy Dove Is in Full Bloom at Her First Public Appearance
7 common issues people face when speaking in public
Who are the most valuable sports franchises? Forbes releases new list of top 50 teams
Russia opens a vast national exposition as presidential election approaches
Humanoid robots are here, but they’re a little awkward. Do we really need them?
Moldovans cast ballots in local elections amid claims of Russian meddling