Current:Home > ContactFDA moves to ease restrictions on blood donations for men who have sex with men -SovereignWealth
FDA moves to ease restrictions on blood donations for men who have sex with men
View
Date:2025-04-19 15:14:35
Updated 12:55 p.m. ET
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued proposed guidance Friday to ease restrictions on blood donations by men who have sex with men.
The change is expected to take effect after a public comment period.
The restrictions on donating blood date back to the early days of the AIDS epidemic and were designed to protect the blood supply from HIV. Originally, gay and bisexual men were completely prohibited from donating blood. Over time, the FDA relaxed the lifetime ban, but still kept in place some limits.
Under the current policy — last updated in 2020 — men who have sex with men can donate blood if they haven't had sexual contact with other men for three months.
The new proposed policy would eliminate the time-based restrictions on men who have sex with men (and their female partners) and instead screen potential donors' eligibility based on a series of questions that assess their HIV risk, regardless of gender. Anyone taking medications to treat or prevent HIV, including PrEP, would not be eligible.
The risk assessment would include questions about anal sex. Potential donors who've had anal sex in the last three months with a new sexual partner or more than one sexual partner would not be eligible to give blood.
The changes are aimed at addressing criticism that the current policy is discriminatory and outdated, as well as one more barrier to bolstering the nation's blood supply. Blood banks already routinely screen donated blood for HIV.
"We are moving now to an inclusive policy for blood donation," said Dr. Peter Marks, who leads the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research at the FDA during a briefing Friday.
"We will continue to work to make sure that we have policies that allow everyone who wants to donate blood to be able to donate blood within what the science allows to make sure that the blood supply remains safe."
In crafting the new guidance, the FDA has been looking to the results of a study of about 1,600 gay and bisexual men to develop screening questions that can identify potential donors who are most likely to be infected with HIV.
Reaction to the news from advocates, medical groups and blood banks has been positive.
"The blood community is very excited about the proposed changes," says Kate Fry, CEO of America's Blood Centers. "We have advocated for a decade now for a move to an individual risk assessment model. So this is very welcome by blood centers across the country."
She stressed that all donated blood is carefully screened for HIV and that testing has improved dramatically to ensure the safety of the blood supply.
For many years, the American Medical Association, the American Red Cross and LGBTQ+ advocacy groups have pushed for a change to the federal rules on blood donations.
"These changes are 40-plus years in the making and they're a tremendous leap forward in elevating science over stigma," says Tony Morrison, a spokesperson for the advocacy group GLAAD.
But GLAAD and other groups say the changes still don't go far enough. They argue that some of the remaining restrictions are still unnecessary and stigmatizing, such as the prohibition against donations by people taking medication PrEP to prevent HIV.
"When we limit and defer people who are being proactive in their sexual health that stigmatizes them. The misconception is that people on PrEP are promiscuous or have a higher risk of HIV infection — that's categorically false," says Morrison.
So his group will continue to lobby the FDA to further ease restrictions.
The proposed changes in the blood donation rules will be open for public comment for 60 days. The FDA will then review those comments and issue a final rule, probably later this year. So monogamous gay men could start donating blood again sometime in 2023.
veryGood! (7)
Related
- New data highlights 'achievement gap' for students in the US
- Michael Crichton estate sues Warner Bros., claims new show 'The Pitt' is an 'ER' ripoff
- Killings of invasive owls to ramp up on US West Coast in a bid to save native birds
- Family of Grand Canyon flash flood victim raises funds for search team: 'Profoundly grateful'
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
- RFK Jr. appeals ruling that knocked him off New York’s presidential election ballot
- NTSB report faults trucking company logs in fatal 2022 bus crash
- Militia group member sentenced to 5 years in prison for Capitol riot plot
- Whoopi Goldberg is delightfully vile as Miss Hannigan in ‘Annie’ stage return
- 'Having a blast': Video shows bear take a dip in a hot tub in California
Ranking
- Military service academies see drop in reported sexual assaults after alarming surge
- DJT sinks to new low: Why Trump Media investors are feeling less bullish
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Found Art
- Mega Millions winning numbers for August 27 drawing; Jackpot climbs to $582 million
- Juan Soto to be introduced by Mets at Citi Field after striking record $765 million, 15
- NCT member Taeil leaves K-pop group following sexual offense allegations
- Want Thicker, Fuller Hair? These Are the Top Hair Growth Treatments, According to an Expert
- Killings of invasive owls to ramp up on US West Coast in a bid to save native birds
Recommendation
Finally, good retirement news! Southwest pilots' plan is a bright spot, experts say
What’s hot in theaters? Old movies — and some that aren’t so old
'Lord of the Rings' series 'The Rings of Power' is beautiful but empty in Season 2
New US rules try to make it harder for criminals to launder money by paying cash for homes
Which apps offer encrypted messaging? How to switch and what to know after feds’ warning
San Diego police identify the officer killed in a collision with a speeding vehicle
Memphis, Tennessee murder suspect crashes through ceiling as US Marshals search for him
Rohingya refugees mark the anniversary of their exodus and demand a safe return to Myanmar