Current:Home > MarketsProposal to allow local police to make arrests near Arizona border with Mexico will appear on ballot -SovereignWealth
Proposal to allow local police to make arrests near Arizona border with Mexico will appear on ballot
View
Date:2025-04-17 11:28:18
PHOENIX (AP) — The Arizona Supreme Court has ruled that a proposal that would let local police make arrests near the state’s border with Mexico will appear on the Nov. 5 ballot for voters to decide.
That sets up the biggest push to draw local authorities into immigration enforcement since the state’s landmark 2010 law that required police to question people’s immigration status in certain situations.
The court late Tuesday afternoon rejected a challenge from Latino groups that argued the ballot measure had violated a rule in the state constitution that says legislative proposals must cover a single subject. In an order by Chief Justice Ann A. Scott Timmer, the state’s highest court concluded the measure satisfies the single-subject rule.
If approved by voters, the proposal, known as Proposition 314, would make it a state crime for people to cross the Arizona-Mexico border anywhere except a port of entry, give state and local law enforcement officers the power to arrest violators and let state judges order people to return to their home countries.
It also would make it a felony punishable by up to 10 years in prison for selling fentanyl that leads to a person’s death and require some government agencies to use a federal database to verify a noncitizen’s eligibility for benefits. The proposal will go before voters in a state expected to play a crucial role in determining which party controls the White House and the U.S. Senate. Republicans hope it will focus attention on the border and dilute the political benefits Democrats seek from an abortion-rights ballot measure.
Opponents had argued the proposal dealt with the unrelated subjects of immigration enforcement, the fentanyl crisis and the regulation of public benefits. A lower court had previously rejected those arguments.
While federal law already prohibits the unauthorized entry of migrants into the U.S., proponents of the measure say it’s needed because the federal government hasn’t done enough to stop people from crossing illegally over Arizona’s porous border with Mexico. They also said some people who enter Arizona without authorization commit identity theft and take advantage of public benefits. Opponents say the proposal would lead to racial profiling, hurt Arizona’s reputation in the business world and carry huge unfunded costs for police departments that don’t typically enforce immigration law.
In early June, the Republican-controlled Legislature voted to put the measure on the ballot, bypassing Democratic Gov. Katie Hobbs, who had vetoed a similar measure in early March and had denounced the effort to bring the issue to voters.
This isn’t the first time Republican lawmakers in Arizona have tried to criminalize migration.
When passing its 2010 immigration bill, the Arizona Legislature considered expanding the state’s trespassing law to criminalize the presence of immigrants and impose criminal penalties. But the trespassing language was removed and replaced with a requirement that officers, while enforcing other laws, question people’s immigration status if they were believed to be in the country illegally.
The questioning requirement was ultimately upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court despite the racial profiling concerns of critics, but courts barred enforcement of other sections of the law. Earlier this week, the Arizona Secretary of State’s Office said supporters of a proposal that would enshrine abortion rights in the state’s constitution had gathered enough signatures to put the measure on the November ballot. If approved, it would allow abortions until a fetus could survive outside the womb, typically around 24 weeks, with exceptions to save the mother’s life or to protect her physical or mental health. Abortion is currently legal for the first 15 weeks of pregnancy in Arizona.
veryGood! (6)
Related
- Nevada attorney general revives 2020 fake electors case
- Former longtime South Carolina congressman John Spratt dies at 82
- The company planning a successor to Concorde makes its first supersonic test
- Dick Vitale announces he is cancer free: 'Santa Claus came early'
- $73.5M beach replenishment project starts in January at Jersey Shore
- At site of suspected mass killings, Syrians recall horrors, hope for answers
- At site of suspected mass killings, Syrians recall horrors, hope for answers
- 2 killed, 3 injured in shooting at makeshift club in Houston
- Google unveils a quantum chip. Could it help unlock the universe's deepest secrets?
- Moving abroad can be expensive: These 5 countries will 'pay' you to move there
Ranking
- See you latte: Starbucks plans to cut 30% of its menu
- Former Danish minister for Greenland discusses Trump's push to acquire island
- Which apps offer encrypted messaging? How to switch and what to know after feds’ warning
- Former Syrian official arrested in California who oversaw prison charged with torture
- What do we know about the mysterious drones reported flying over New Jersey?
- Mets have visions of grandeur, and a dynasty, with Juan Soto as major catalyst
- Whoopi Goldberg is delightfully vile as Miss Hannigan in ‘Annie’ stage return
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
Recommendation
'Survivor' 47 finale, part one recap: 2 players were sent home. Who's left in the game?
Who are the most valuable sports franchises? Forbes releases new list of top 50 teams
Former longtime South Carolina congressman John Spratt dies at 82
New data highlights 'achievement gap' for students in the US
Sam Taylor
Angelina Jolie nearly fainted making Maria Callas movie: 'My body wasn’t strong enough'
'Squid Game' without subtitles? Duolingo, Netflix encourage fans to learn Korean
San Francisco names street for Associated Press photographer who captured the iconic Iwo Jima photo